Summary
Why is the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) score implied rating through the CVSS score system that high (or low) when compared to the criticality rating assigned by Secunia Research?
Synopsis
The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) system itself is unfortunately not that suitable to derive the actual criticality nor the prioritization of a vulnerability. While the CVSS system is a standardized system that allows assessing certain, important vulnerability related information through the metrics (for example confidentiality impact), the calculated score based on the metrics is not necessarily that beneficial when it comes to determining the actual criticality and, as a follow-up, the prioritization of a vulnerability.
Discussion
Frequently, the scoring for even minor vulnerabilities, such as those that require locally authenticated access of an attacker to a system, will produce CVSS scores beyond 6 and 7, which does not accurately reflect the actual exploitation potential and in turn does not truly allow a proper prioritization for any customer. This also is reflected by the CVSS score derived rating "Low" being very underutilized, which indicates that CVSS itself appears to have a scaling issue. This is already true for the version 2 of CVSS, but even more so for the version 3 of CVSS, where the scoring on average appears to have increased further. If more than 90% of vulnerability scores end up in the higher spectrum, then the scaling is out of balance.
Secunia Research, the vulnerability intelligence behind Flexera's Security Vulnerability Management (SVM) business and in the vulnerability intelligence business, has developed a criticality scoring methodology that allows companies to judge the priority of valid vulnerabilities accurately. The rating is based on an analysis performed by Secunia Research and takes the vulnerability, product context, and security best practices into account. This additional layer of scoring helps customers and security teams identify prioritization of vulnerabilities precisely.
Related Documents
https://secuniaresearch.flexerasoftware.com/community/advisories/terminology/
Related Articles
Secunia Research inception of CVSS3 scoring 9Number of Views Suggest Software for tracking in Software Vulnerability Research 33Number of Views CVE-2024-2658: FlexNet Publisher potential local privilege escalation issue 20Number of Views The anatomy of a security advisory 24Number of Views FlexNet Inventory Agent and Inventory Beacon Vulnerability Update IOK-1085727 35Number of Views
Hi, I am Reva - Ask me anything.
No new updates
Thanks for the feedback!
Your feedback has been saved.Rate this response:
Add Additional feedback ( Optional )
Are you sure you want to cancel
the case creation?
Are you sure you want to cancel the case creation?
Are you sure you want to close this case
| Products | Region | Phone Numbers |
|---|---|---|
| FlexNet Operations FlexNet Embedded FlexNet Publisher FlexNet Connect FlexNet Code Insight InstallAnywhere InstallShield |
North America * |
+1 630-332-2513 (toll) +1 877-279-2853 (toll-free in North America) |
| Europe * |
+44 1925 944367 (toll) +44 800 047 8642 (toll-free in Europe) |
|
| Japan * | +81 3-4540-5335 (select option 2) | |
| Australia * |
+61 3 9895 2177 +61 1800 560 603 (toll-free in Australia) |
|
|
Usage Intelligence (formerly
Revulytics) Compliance Intelligence |
Please use the Case Portal to submit your support ticket or reach out to your Revenera contact. | |
Revenera Assistant
Case id: 00001065
Activity: Status change: 2 hours ago